The most recent of these attacks was on a diver off the north coast of Rottnest Island on October The other, involving a body-boarder, took place at Bunker Bay on September 4. A disappearance at Cottesloe Beach on October 10 has also been attributed to a shark.
Tiger shark, Albert Kok, Creative Commons Every year, between 5 and 15 people are killed by sharks world wide.
For their part, human beings kill more than million sharks, world wide, every year. This is the cruel practice of cutting the fin off the shark and, often, throwing the shark back into the ocean to die a lingering death as it is unable to swim properly.
The method is to set out baited hooks and wait for sharks to come and get caught. They are then killed if not already deadand the bodies are towed out to sea. Only three species are meant to be killed: Only animals over two meters in length are meant to be killed.
The great white shark is protected by both state and federal legislation as an endangered species. Already the hooks are catching individuals that are smaller than can be killed. There appears to be no monitoring of the effects of this method on the individuals of these beleaguered species.
Once again I am reminded of the zombie politics that seeks to display power through killing. The discourse may be managerial a problem to be solvedbut the underlying logic is not.
Zombie politics seek power through the demonisation and death of unwanted others.
And yet, this politics of death-making seems to be thriving. This is the politics that is driving so much of the damage that is unmaking planet earth today.
Our standard discourse often inadvertently feeds into the politics of death-making. My point was that every story has more than two sides.
In that post, I offered eleven sides to the story of the cruel persecution of flying-foxes in Charters Towers, Queensland. The significant point is that good ecological thought involves exploring numerous sides to any story. I came up with 13 sides to the current shark kill, and I am sure other people will be able to add more.
In contrast to ecological thinking, the decision to kill sharks is based on a simple oppositional binary: Politicians are of course saying the lives of humans are more important.
Almost everyone else, though, is refusing to play the binary game. There are many ways to achieve co-existence, they are saying, and killing gets in the way of better solutions.Essay Writing Help from EssayShark Don’t worry, you are not the only one who has writing problems.
It is quite normal to get help if you are not able to cope with essay writing. You simply need to leave the request, “write my essay. Speech on Shark Finning Essay Speech on Shark Finning Shark Finning, the illegal fishing which involves the cutting of the sharks fins, and then the carcass is thrown back into the water.
This is wrong, just think for a minute, and put yourselves into the ‘shoes’ of those sharks. Shark finning and shark fin soup have for years been the focus of conservation campaigns, but cracking down on illegal fishing will also help decrease shark mortality.
For measures like PSMA to be effective for illegal fishing and shark conservation, we need to continually pressure countries to adopt treaties to close those loopholes. Speech on Shark Finning Shark Finning, the illegal fishing which involves the cutting of the sharks fins, and then the carcass is thrown back into the water.
This is wrong, just think for a minute, and put yourselves into the ‘shoes’ of those sharks. Shark finning pertains to the retention and removal of shark fins wherein sharks are caught alive and later on abandoned at the sea. The sharks are still alive . Heterodontiformes - the Bullhead sharks: they generally live on rocky reefs, eating crustaceans, sae urchins and mollusks.
They are found in the western Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. They have five gill slits on each side of the head, 2 dorsal fins with spines, an anal fin.